Comments on: Leprosy in Jerusalem http://www.ritmeyer.com/2009/12/16/leprosy-in-jerusalem/ ...for the latest research, analysis and products on Biblical Archaeology Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:15:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Leen Ritmeyer http://www.ritmeyer.com/2009/12/16/leprosy-in-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-27942 Leen Ritmeyer Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:24:21 +0000 http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=290#comment-27942 You're right! Thanks. You’re right! Thanks.

]]> By: lorenzo http://www.ritmeyer.com/2009/12/16/leprosy-in-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-27853 lorenzo Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:29:09 +0000 http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=290#comment-27853 the quotation is not John 20:27, but John 20:7 thanks! the quotation is not John 20:27, but John 20:7
thanks!

]]> By: Ray Riley http://www.ritmeyer.com/2009/12/16/leprosy-in-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-26092 Ray Riley Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:22:20 +0000 http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=290#comment-26092 I am trying to figure out how the priests and Levites refilled the brazen sea and the 10 smaller lavers every night. 1- Edersheim in his book on "The Temple It's Ministry and Service" in Cpt 11 (my version, p.159)says "the sound of the machinery, as it filled the laver with water, admonished the others to be in readiness. This machinery had been made by Ben Catin, who also altered the laver so that 12 priests could at the same time perform their ablutions." Could there have been a shaft descending down to the cisterns underneath whereby a contraption of ropes and buckets could have hauled water up to the Brazen Sea? Was this the "machinery"? If not, how were they refilled? 2- Water to the Temple 10 02 26 Copied "The Lower Aqueduct" The “artery” we are dealing with here is the Lower Aqueduct of Jerusalem, which ran for 21.5 km from Solomon’s Pools (765m ASL) to the Temple Mount (735m ASL). In that distance, it dropped a mere 30 meters, for a gradient of 0.14% (1:700+). Put another way, in the length of a football field, the floor of the channel dropped only 14 cm! The original Lower Aqueduct has now been firmly dated to the Hasmonean period. This is based not only on ceramics and coins related to its construction but also similarities to the water systems of the Hasmonean desert fortresses, including a distinctive type of plaster. Thus, along with one or more of the Solomon’s Pools, it is (in its original form) the oldest part of Jerusalem’s aqueduct system. It is mentioned a number of places in the Talmud, which says that “an aqueduct ran to [the Temple] from Eitam [a spring located near Solomon’s Pools],” and a midrash states that the same aqueduct was destroyed by the sicarii during the Great Revolt. … The aqueduct continues around the slopes of Mt. Zion and then beneath (outside) the present-day city walls [PHOTO ▼]. Entering the Old City west of Dung Gate, it proceeds through today’s Jewish Quarter, along the scarp of the Western Hill opposite the Kotel plaza area (where traces have been documented but not preserved). … Via the Wilson’s Arch bridge, the Lower Aqueduct led onto the Temple Mount to its ultimate (original) destination, the cisterns beneath the Haram platform … Very nearby is the largest of the Temple Mount cisterns, the one the explorers dubbed “The Great Sea.” Accompanying Warren in 1869, the English artist William “Crimea” Simpson sketched this cavernous reservoir by the light of a burning magnesium wire, and later produced this watercolor. (Photo) It is still not known whether (or how) these various cisterns might be connected. [It appears from the map that the aqueduct did deliver water to the Temple Mount over Wilson’s arch, and into the huge cisterns beneath the Temple, to be hauled to the various locations, such as refilling the Brazen Sea as needed. I speak only as one trying to understand something from a far, both in place and time, which I have never seen. --- rar] Warm regards, Ray Riley I am trying to figure out how the priests and Levites refilled the brazen sea and the 10 smaller lavers every night.

1- Edersheim in his book on “The Temple It’s Ministry and Service” in Cpt 11 (my version, p.159)says “the sound of the machinery, as it filled the laver with water, admonished the others to be in readiness.

This machinery had been made by Ben Catin, who also altered the laver so that 12 priests could at the same time perform their ablutions.”

Could there have been a shaft descending down to the cisterns underneath whereby a contraption of ropes and buckets could have hauled water up to the Brazen Sea? Was this the “machinery”?

If not, how were they refilled?

2-
Water to the Temple 10 02 26
Copied
“The Lower Aqueduct”

The “artery” we are dealing with here is the Lower Aqueduct of Jerusalem, which ran for 21.5 km from Solomon’s Pools (765m ASL) to the Temple Mount (735m ASL). In that distance, it dropped a mere 30 meters, for a gradient of 0.14% (1:700+). Put another way, in the length of a football field, the floor of the channel dropped only 14 cm!

The original Lower Aqueduct has now been firmly dated to the Hasmonean period. This is based not only on ceramics and coins related to its construction but also similarities to the water systems of the Hasmonean desert fortresses, including a distinctive type of plaster. Thus, along with one or more of the Solomon’s Pools, it is (in its original form) the oldest part of Jerusalem’s aqueduct system. It is mentioned a number of places in the Talmud, which says that “an aqueduct ran to [the Temple] from Eitam [a spring located near Solomon’s Pools],” and a midrash states that the same aqueduct was destroyed by the sicarii during the Great Revolt.
…
The aqueduct continues around the slopes of Mt. Zion and then beneath (outside) the present-day city walls [PHOTO ▼]. Entering the Old City west of Dung Gate, it proceeds through today’s Jewish Quarter, along the scarp of the Western Hill opposite the Kotel plaza area (where traces have been documented but not preserved).
…
Via the Wilson’s Arch bridge, the Lower Aqueduct led onto the Temple Mount to its ultimate (original) destination, the cisterns beneath the Haram platform
…
Very nearby is the largest of the Temple Mount cisterns, the one the explorers dubbed “The Great Sea.” Accompanying Warren in 1869, the English artist William “Crimea” Simpson sketched this cavernous reservoir by the light of a burning magnesium wire, and later produced this watercolor. (Photo) It is still not known whether (or how) these various cisterns might be connected.

[It appears from the map that the aqueduct did deliver water to the Temple Mount over Wilson’s arch, and into the huge cisterns beneath the Temple, to be hauled to the various locations, such as refilling the Brazen Sea as needed. I speak only as one trying to understand something from a far, both in place and time, which I have never seen. --- rar]

Warm regards,
Ray Riley

]]>