<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ritmeyer Archaeological Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritmeyer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com</link>
	<description>...for the latest research, analysis and products on Biblical Archaeology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:47:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Building a Sacrificial Altar on Tisha B&#8217;av by moshé</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2009/07/29/building-a-sacrificial-altar-on-tisha-bav/comment-page-1/#comment-26337</link>
		<dc:creator>moshé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=250#comment-26337</guid>
		<description>Después de casi 2000 años sin sacrificios de cordero en Jerusalem. Sin altar y sin la presencia de sacerdotes levitas. Nuevamente éste 16 de Marzo de 2010 los habrá.

http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&amp;nid=20063

http://lasteologias.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/comienzan-los-sacrificios-de-corderos-en-jerusalem/

La junta rabínica del Sanedrín declara que a partir de ésta fecha comienza la era de la reconstrucción del tercer templo de Salomón.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Después de casi 2000 años sin sacrificios de cordero en Jerusalem. Sin altar y sin la presencia de sacerdotes levitas. Nuevamente éste 16 de Marzo de 2010 los habrá.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&amp;nid=20063">http://www.israeltoday.co.il/default.aspx?tabid=178&amp;nid=20063</a></p>
<p><a href="http://lasteologias.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/comienzan-los-sacrificios-de-corderos-en-jerusalem/">http://lasteologias.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/comienzan-los-sacrificios-de-corderos-en-jerusalem/</a></p>
<p>La junta rabínica del Sanedrín declara que a partir de ésta fecha comienza la era de la reconstrucción del tercer templo de Salomón.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 360 degree view of the Double Gate Tunnel by Drs R. van den Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/01/30/360-degree-view-of-the-double-gate-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-26115</link>
		<dc:creator>Drs R. van den Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=298#comment-26115</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir.


Translating my site in a good way is too expensive.

Possible is:Google translate.com and fill in my Webpage URL 
WWW.bijbelseplaatsen.nl From Netherlands in English or other language or hour native language

The three latest articles (see HOME) are Jerusalem excavations, Abraham.ecumenism and Bible.It is not scientifically written. but I hope you can understand. I mentioned your name somewhere IN jERUSALEM EXCAVATIONS

With kind regards
Reinier van den Berg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir.</p>
<p>Translating my site in a good way is too expensive.</p>
<p>Possible is:Google translate.com and fill in my Webpage URL<br />
<a href="http://WWW.bijbelseplaatsen.nl">http://WWW.bijbelseplaatsen.nl</a> From Netherlands in English or other language or hour native language</p>
<p>The three latest articles (see HOME) are Jerusalem excavations, Abraham.ecumenism and Bible.It is not scientifically written. but I hope you can understand. I mentioned your name somewhere IN jERUSALEM EXCAVATIONS</p>
<p>With kind regards<br />
Reinier van den Berg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leprosy in Jerusalem by Ray Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2009/12/16/leprosy-in-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-26092</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=290#comment-26092</guid>
		<description>I am trying to figure out how the priests and Levites refilled the brazen sea and the 10 smaller lavers every night. 

1- Edersheim in his book on &quot;The Temple It&#039;s Ministry and Service&quot; in Cpt 11 (my version, p.159)says &quot;the sound of the machinery, as it filled the laver with water, admonished the others to be in readiness. 

  This machinery had been made by Ben Catin, who also altered the laver so that 12 priests could at the same time perform their ablutions.&quot;  

  Could there have been a shaft descending down to the cisterns underneath whereby a contraption of ropes and buckets could have hauled water up to the Brazen Sea? Was this the &quot;machinery&quot;?

If not, how were they refilled?

2-
Water to the Temple  10 02 26
Copied
&quot;The Lower Aqueduct&quot;

The “artery” we are dealing with here is the Lower Aqueduct of Jerusalem, which ran for 21.5 km from Solomon’s Pools (765m ASL) to the Temple Mount (735m ASL). In that distance, it dropped a mere 30 meters, for a gradient of 0.14%  (1:700+). Put another way, in the length of a football field, the floor of the channel dropped only 14 cm!

The original Lower Aqueduct has now been firmly dated to the Hasmonean period. This is based not only on ceramics and coins related to its construction but also similarities to the water systems of the Hasmonean desert fortresses, including a distinctive type of plaster. Thus, along with one or more of the Solomon’s Pools, it is (in its original form) the oldest part of Jerusalem’s aqueduct system. It is mentioned a number of places in the Talmud, which says that “an aqueduct ran to [the Temple] from Eitam [a spring located near Solomon’s Pools],” and a midrash states that the same aqueduct was destroyed by the sicarii during the Great Revolt.
…
The aqueduct continues around the slopes of Mt. Zion and then beneath (outside) the present-day city walls [PHOTO ▼]. Entering the Old City west of Dung Gate, it proceeds through today’s Jewish Quarter, along the scarp of the Western Hill opposite the Kotel plaza area (where traces have been documented but not preserved).
…
Via the Wilson’s Arch bridge, the Lower Aqueduct led onto the Temple Mount to its ultimate (original) destination, the cisterns beneath the Haram platform
…
Very nearby is the largest of the Temple Mount cisterns, the one the explorers dubbed “The Great Sea.” Accompanying Warren in 1869, the English artist William “Crimea” Simpson sketched this cavernous reservoir by the light of a burning magnesium wire, and later produced this watercolor. (Photo) It is still not known whether (or how) these various cisterns might be connected.

[It appears from the map that the aqueduct did deliver water to the Temple Mount  over Wilson’s arch, and into the huge cisterns beneath the Temple, to be hauled to the various locations, such as refilling the Brazen Sea as needed. I speak only as one trying to understand something from a far, both in place and time, which I have never seen. --- rar] 




Warm regards,
Ray Riley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to figure out how the priests and Levites refilled the brazen sea and the 10 smaller lavers every night. </p>
<p>1- Edersheim in his book on &#8220;The Temple It&#8217;s Ministry and Service&#8221; in Cpt 11 (my version, p.159)says &#8220;the sound of the machinery, as it filled the laver with water, admonished the others to be in readiness. </p>
<p>  This machinery had been made by Ben Catin, who also altered the laver so that 12 priests could at the same time perform their ablutions.&#8221;  </p>
<p>  Could there have been a shaft descending down to the cisterns underneath whereby a contraption of ropes and buckets could have hauled water up to the Brazen Sea? Was this the &#8220;machinery&#8221;?</p>
<p>If not, how were they refilled?</p>
<p>2-<br />
Water to the Temple  10 02 26<br />
Copied<br />
&#8220;The Lower Aqueduct&#8221;</p>
<p>The “artery” we are dealing with here is the Lower Aqueduct of Jerusalem, which ran for 21.5 km from Solomon’s Pools (765m ASL) to the Temple Mount (735m ASL). In that distance, it dropped a mere 30 meters, for a gradient of 0.14%  (1:700+). Put another way, in the length of a football field, the floor of the channel dropped only 14 cm!</p>
<p>The original Lower Aqueduct has now been firmly dated to the Hasmonean period. This is based not only on ceramics and coins related to its construction but also similarities to the water systems of the Hasmonean desert fortresses, including a distinctive type of plaster. Thus, along with one or more of the Solomon’s Pools, it is (in its original form) the oldest part of Jerusalem’s aqueduct system. It is mentioned a number of places in the Talmud, which says that “an aqueduct ran to [the Temple] from Eitam [a spring located near Solomon’s Pools],” and a midrash states that the same aqueduct was destroyed by the sicarii during the Great Revolt.<br />
…<br />
The aqueduct continues around the slopes of Mt. Zion and then beneath (outside) the present-day city walls [PHOTO ▼]. Entering the Old City west of Dung Gate, it proceeds through today’s Jewish Quarter, along the scarp of the Western Hill opposite the Kotel plaza area (where traces have been documented but not preserved).<br />
…<br />
Via the Wilson’s Arch bridge, the Lower Aqueduct led onto the Temple Mount to its ultimate (original) destination, the cisterns beneath the Haram platform<br />
…<br />
Very nearby is the largest of the Temple Mount cisterns, the one the explorers dubbed “The Great Sea.” Accompanying Warren in 1869, the English artist William “Crimea” Simpson sketched this cavernous reservoir by the light of a burning magnesium wire, and later produced this watercolor. (Photo) It is still not known whether (or how) these various cisterns might be connected.</p>
<p>[It appears from the map that the aqueduct did deliver water to the Temple Mount  over Wilson’s arch, and into the huge cisterns beneath the Temple, to be hauled to the various locations, such as refilling the Brazen Sea as needed. I speak only as one trying to understand something from a far, both in place and time, which I have never seen. --- rar] </p>
<p>Warm regards,<br />
Ray Riley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Temple period wall found in Jerusalem by Seth Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/02/22/first-temple-period-wall-found-in-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-26081</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=306#comment-26081</guid>
		<description>Yes, efi, if you are able, please ask Eilat about the epigraphic material that *was* found under the floor. Without being clear about the relationship between finds and contexts it is impossible to even begin to judge the significance of the discoveries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, efi, if you are able, please ask Eilat about the epigraphic material that *was* found under the floor. Without being clear about the relationship between finds and contexts it is impossible to even begin to judge the significance of the discoveries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 360 degree view of the Double Gate Tunnel by Leen Ritmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/01/30/360-degree-view-of-the-double-gate-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-26058</link>
		<dc:creator>Leen Ritmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=298#comment-26058</guid>
		<description>I like your website because I can read Dutch. You should make it available in English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your website because I can read Dutch. You should make it available in English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Temple period wall found in Jerusalem by Leen Ritmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/02/22/first-temple-period-wall-found-in-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-26053</link>
		<dc:creator>Leen Ritmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=306#comment-26053</guid>
		<description>It would have been helpful if the facts had been stated clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been helpful if the facts had been stated clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Temple period wall found in Jerusalem by efi</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/02/22/first-temple-period-wall-found-in-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-26052</link>
		<dc:creator>efi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=306#comment-26052</guid>
		<description>If these seals came from under the floors then you are right - problem is that they did not (E. Mazar, per. comm.). You cannot just throw out hypothesis about the location of finds without knowing the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these seals came from under the floors then you are right &#8211; problem is that they did not (E. Mazar, per. comm.). You cannot just throw out hypothesis about the location of finds without knowing the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 360 degree view of the Double Gate Tunnel by Drs R. van den Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/01/30/360-degree-view-of-the-double-gate-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-26028</link>
		<dc:creator>Drs R. van den Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=298#comment-26028</guid>
		<description>Dear friend,

I am struck by the impressive report of your article
See www.bijbelseplaatsen.nl or the same www.biblicalplaces.org

Thank you very much. Hints?

With kind regard Reinier van den Berg Netherlands</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear friend,</p>
<p>I am struck by the impressive report of your article<br />
See <a href="http://www.bijbelseplaatsen.nl">http://www.bijbelseplaatsen.nl</a> or the same <a href="http://www.biblicalplaces.org">http://www.biblicalplaces.org</a></p>
<p>Thank you very much. Hints?</p>
<p>With kind regard Reinier van den Berg Netherlands</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 360 degree view of the Double Gate Tunnel by Leen Ritmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/01/30/360-degree-view-of-the-double-gate-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-26022</link>
		<dc:creator>Leen Ritmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=298#comment-26022</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is correct. The picture faces north and up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is correct. The picture faces north and up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 360 degree view of the Double Gate Tunnel by Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ritmeyer.com/2010/01/30/360-degree-view-of-the-double-gate-tunnel/comment-page-1/#comment-26019</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritmeyer.com/?p=298#comment-26019</guid>
		<description>Am I facing north in the picture, upward to the temple mount level? Just want to make sure my orientation is right. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I facing north in the picture, upward to the temple mount level? Just want to make sure my orientation is right. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
